Add an Uptime Kuma integration: monitor status and which server each one watches
New integration, following the existing pattern: config in-app (URL + API key, credentials encrypted at rest), its own Uptime Kuma page, an Integrations list entry, a Dashboard widget, and diagnostic-log/ integration-down-alert coverage for free via the shared withDiagLogging wrapper. Read-only -- no start/stop equivalent exists for a monitor. Uptime Kuma has no conventional REST API (the dashboard talks to it over Socket.IO); researched before writing any code, since guessing wrong here would have cost real time. The one machine-readable, authenticated endpoint that lists every monitor is its Prometheus exporter at GET /metrics, gated by HTTP Basic auth -- an API key as the password with the username left blank on current installs, or the real dashboard login on installs from before the API-key feature existed. This adapter authenticates the same way and parses that endpoint's text-exposition format itself (metrics: monitor_status, monitor_response_time, monitor_cert_days_remaining, monitor_uptime_ratio; labels: monitor_id, monitor_name, monitor_type, monitor_url, monitor_hostname, monitor_port), verified against the documented metric/label set and the actual upstream source (server/prometheus.js). A malformed line is skipped rather than failing the whole scrape. "What server is being monitored for what": each monitor's target (an IP for TCP checks, or the hostname out of the URL for HTTP/keyword checks) is matched against your servers' own IPs and hostnames -- reusing the same kind of match already used in the consistency report -- and linked to that server's page. Monitors with no single network target (groups, push monitors, DNS/keyword checks with a complex URL) are left unmatched rather than guessed at. Uptime Kuma's tags aren't read, since the Prometheus endpoint doesn't reliably distinguish a tag label from any other label it might add later. The username field is the first genuinely optional integration config field this app has had; IntegrationField gained an `optional` flag (server validation and both the add/edit web forms honor it) rather than special-casing Uptime Kuma. Verified with 48 backend checks (Prometheus text parsing including escaped quotes, decimals, negative numbers, and malformed lines; TCP vs. HTTP target/port extraction; every documented status code; server matching by IP, hostname, and short name, including no-match cases; the route's real HTTP round trip against a fake Uptime Kuma server, wrong credentials, upstream failures, roles, wrong/disabled/missing integration, diagnostic-log entries; the optional-field validation rule) and by driving the real page and the real Dashboard widget in a browser against the real routers, including CSV export and column sorting. Real dev database mtime untouched. Not verified: a real Uptime Kuma instance. Everything here was checked against Uptime Kuma's documented metric format, its actual upstream source, and a fake server built to match both -- not against a live installation. If your instance's /metrics output differs from what's documented (older version, unusual monitor types), the parser should degrade to an empty or partial monitor list rather than error, but that degradation itself hasn't been observed against the real thing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
ada2e648e9
commit
1a2dd19736
19 files changed
+706
-15
No files matched your search
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ const INTEGRATION_NAMES: Record<string, string> = {
|
||||
semaphore: "Semaphore",
|
||||
gitea: "Gitea",
|
||||
dockhand: "Dockhand",
|
||||
uptimekuma: "Uptime Kuma",
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
function ColorList({
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user